Support zero rowspans
This makes rowspan=0 work by storing notes on which group of rows we're in
for tables containing both rowgroups and rows, and using that to respan
cells with overlarge or zero rowspans.
This also gets rid of the largest_leftover_incoming_size business, because
now spans will always be correct and we'll never have any left over.
Based on https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/20128
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20152)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This makes rowspan=0 work by storing notes on which group of rows we're
in for tables containing both rowgroups and rows, and using that to
respan cells with overlarge or zero rowspans.
This also gets rid of the largest_leftover_incoming_size business,
because now spans will always be correct and we'll never have any left
over.
Rowspan support for tables
fixes#20092
This just contains the first steps.
We apply a naive algorithm: Spanning cells apply a pressure equal to `block_size / rowspan` on each row they are in. We move table row block size computation into the tables, and make it two pass. In the first pass we compute the sizes of each row, and in the
second pass we assign them, adding them up for any involved cells.
This is missing:
- [x] Accounting for border sizes
- [x] Applying pressure to rows that are not the row containing the cell
- [ ] Reducing pressure on future rows if the current row is able to accomodate more of the cell
- [x] For tables containing both rows and rowgroups, reset the rowspan info when we hit a rowgroup
- [x] Correctly handle overflowing rowspans
cc @mbrubeck @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20128)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Only expose longhands to rust via iterators.
The key here is that we only filter longhands if the shorthand is accessible to
content and vice-versa. This prevents the bug that prevented me to land this
patch before, which was us not expanding properly chrome-only shorthands.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20138)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The key here is that we only filter longhands if the shorthand is accessible to
content and vice-versa. This prevents the bug that prevented me to land this
patch before, which was us not expanding properly chrome-only shorthands.
Again, this is incomplete, and I need to teach LonghandsToSerialize to get a
potentially incomplete list of properties, and all that.
More improvements to come. In particular, this still iterates through Shadow DOM
in each_xbl_cascade_data, but that should be changed later. That allows to
cleanup a bunch of stuff and finally fix Shadow DOM cascade order.
We still rely on the binding parent to be setup properly in the shadow tree, but
that requirement can go away later (we can walk the containing shadow chain
instead).
This mostly focuses on removing the XBL binding from the Shadow host.
It'd be nice to do EnumerateShadowRoots faster. I think that should also be a
followup, if needed.
Bug: 1425759
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jf2iGvLC5de
Avoid `Window::GetComputedStyle` when checking for `display: none`
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Refactored Window::GetComputedStyle to use Element::Style.
Not sure which tests are relevant, but I've ran the dom, fetch & 2dcontext wpt tests. They don't seem to give errors.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19885.
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests because it's a refactoring task
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20012)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
