Implement NavigationPreloadManager for ServiceWorker
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #19302 .
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/22218)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Minor pull request template cleanup
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Some minor changes to improve the consistency of the pull request template.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/22391)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Kill test processes whenever any error occurs
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#21822
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/22272)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fixup the issue related with an incorrect distro version string handling
The original fixes for #21732 had a mistake.
The fix don't work on the LinuxMint with version 19:
```
File "./mach", line 96, in <module>
main(sys.argv)
File "./mach", line 24, in main
sys.exit(mach_bootstrap.bootstrap_command_only(topdir))
File "/home/user/workspace/skv/servo/python/mach_bootstrap.py", line 239, in bootstrap_command_only
bootstrap(context, force)
File "/home/user/workspace/skv/servo/python/servo/bootstrap.py", line 380, in bootstrap
distro, version = get_linux_distribution()
File "/home/user/workspace/skv/servo/python/servo/bootstrap.py", line 349, in get_linux_distribution
major, minor = version.split('.')
ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack
```
I've fixed that
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#21732
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/22390)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use the base Ubuntu distro instead of LinuxMint in './mach bootstrap'
I'm LinuxMint user.
I couldn't install all dependencies via `./mach bootstrap` due to error, described in this ticket: https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/21732
As LinuxMint is based on the stable Ubuntu, I've made a little fix for the `bootstrap` procedure.
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#21732 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because I haven't found the tests for `./mach bootstrap` (please correct me if I'm wrong)
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/22386)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Cleanup constellation after nll
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This cleans up a couple cases where we had to add extra scopes to appease the borrowck, now that nll has landed, this cleans these up.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because cleanup
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/22376)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Update servo-media. Fixes discarded frames during player setup
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/22377)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
I'm pretty sure the FIXME I left in the outline-style code is a bug,
but I want to clean this up further and I didn't want to fix it without adding
a test.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12859
This is all the style-system work needed for this.
This implements the concept of legacy shorthands, teaches tests to understand
it, and adds a few more tests for these properties in particular.
The WPT even caught a few WebKit / Blink bugs:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=906336https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191803
This doesn't change the layout behavior for page-break-before: always, since
it'd stop breaking in multicol and such. Similarly, break-before / break-after:
column and page still behave the same, I'll file followups for those given
comment 22.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12211
There's a few subtle behavior changes here, which I'll try to break down in the
commit message.
The biggest one is the EditableDescendantCount stuff going away. This
was added in bug 1181130, to prevent clicking on the non-editable div from
selecting the editable div inside. This is problematic for multiple reasons:
* First, I don't think non-editable regions of an editable element should
be user-select: all.
* Second, it just doesn't work in Shadow DOM (the editable descendant count is
not kept up-to-date when not in the uncomposed doc), so nested
contenteditables behave differently inside vs. outside a Shadow Tree.
* Third, I think it's user hostile to just entirely disable selection if you
have a contenteditable descendant as a child of a user-select: all thing.
WebKit behaves like this patch in the following test-case (though not Blink):
https://crisal.io/tmp/user-select-all-contenteditable-descendant.html
Edge doesn't seem to support user-select: all at all (no pun intended).
But we don't allow to select anything at all which looks wrong.
* Fourth, it's not tested at all (which explains how we broke it in Shadow DOM
and not even notice...).
In any case I've verified that this doesn't regress the editor from that bug. If
this regresses anything we can fix it as outlined in the first bullet point
above, which should also make us more compatible with other UAs in that
test-case.
The other change is `all` not overriding everything else. So, something like:
<div style="-webkit-user-select: all">All <div style="-webkit-user-select: none">None</div></div>
Totally ignores the -webkit-user-select: none declaration in Firefox before this
change. This doesn't match any other UA nor the spec, and this patch aligns us
with WebKit / Blink.
This in turn makes us not need -moz-text anymore, whose only purpose was to
avoid this.
This also fixes a variety of bugs uncovered by the previous changes, like the
SetIgnoreUserModify(false) call in editor being completely useless, since
presShell->SetCaretEnabled ended in nsCaret::SetVisible, which overrode it.
This in turn uncovered even more bugs, from bugs in the caret painting code,
like not checking -moz-user-modify on the right frame if you're the last frame
of a line, to even funnier bits where before this patch you show the caret but
can't write at all...
In any case, the new setup I came up with is that when you're editing (the
selection is focused on an editable node) moving the caret forces it to end up
in an editable node, thus jumping over non-editable ones.
This has the nice effect of not completely disabling selection of
-moz-user-select: all elements that have editable descendants (which was a very
ad-hoc hack for bug 1181130, and somewhat broken per the above), and also
not needing the -moz-user-select: all for non-editable bits in contenteditable.css
at all.
This also fixes issues with br-skipping like not being able to insert content in
the following test-case:
<div contenteditable="true"><span contenteditable="false">xyz </span><br>editable</div>
If you start moving to the left from the second line, for example.
I think this yields way better behavior in all the relevant test-cases from bug
1181130 / bug 1109968 / bug 1132768, shouldn't cause any regression, and the
complexity is significantly reduced in some places.
There's still some other broken bits that this patch doesn't fix, but I'll file
follow-ups for those.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12687
