Allow simulate_mouse_click to work with webrender.
Instead of dispatching to a specific layer, call the dispatch
functions for mouse (move) events that handle whether webrender
is enabled or not.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13610)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Removed the session history from BrowsingContext.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
The session history is stored in the constellation and accessed via the `History` object, so `BrowsingContext` doesn't need to track it.
cc @jdm @ConnorGBrewster @Ms2ger
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes do not require tests because it's a refactoring.
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13580)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Removed duplicate #![feature(plugin)]
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Removed duplicate ` #![feature(plugin)]` from two files.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#13581 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because it's removing a few lines.
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13585)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Start simplifying FFI ownership sugar
This is step one of a series of changes planned to make the ownership sugar easier to use. This was blocked on #13038
*very* unsure about second commit. Don't like the thought of accepting types with destructors over FFI. Probably will revert it. Leaving it in for now in case you have some insight.
Eventually at least for the borrowed stuff I want to use T directly (because the crates are merged now), instead of the fake void types. Perhaps for the others too. I might include those changes in this PR -- was originally planning to but I realized that these steps could be split out.
Tentative plan for `Owned` (assuming it's not removed) is to have `Owned<T> <-> Box<T>` (same `T`, no "FFI type") conversions. We will only use ownership wrapper types for things with destructors, and try to keep the conversion simple. I'm envisioning a couple methods for arc/strong and a few more for box/owned. We may need to introduce new wrapper types for gecko-side managed objects (`RefPtr<T>`, `UniquePtr<T>`) but that should be all the wrapper types we have in the ownership sugar.
This PR relies on the guarantee that `Option<&T>` and `Option<Box<T>>` are pointer-sized via the `NonZero` optimization. I am now less unconvinced that this is a good idea 😉.
r? @emilio
cc @mystor
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13569)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
