After #6268 merged, I found out that everything in the tree currently
passes the tidy checker.
---------------
It is worth pointing out that I personally do not know if this is a feature wanted by others. Once I noticed everything was already tidy, I decided to open this PR to start the conversation (if any). I am not convinced this is really a Good Thing, so my feelings would not get hurt if this was closed immediately.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6274)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fixes#1745
Should I adjust the expected result of the corresponding wpt test cases?
html/dom/documents/dom-tree-accessors/document.getElementsByName/document.getElementsByName-namespace.html
html/dom/documents/dom-tree-accessors/document.getElementsByName/document.getElementsByName-namespace.xhtml
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6231)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The existing code for setting up the environment assumes that
the directory layout containing rust and cargo conforms to the
one used by rust-installer's tarballs. This makes overriding
the system root awkward for simple cases where I want to test
my own build directly from the rust build directory. This
patch just adds a second path to PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH
to accomodate both disk layouts.
Conflicts:
python/servo/command_base.py
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6267)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Getting these down to the embedding API level required that I redo the bindings generator again, so this is more commits than anticipated.
@mbrubeck @Manishearth @pcwalton but NOT @larsbergstrom so don't even look at this.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6219)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
it was somewhat impossible to make this work with allocated string_lists
due to constant leakage from box allocations going out of scope, so this should
simplify it ane be more manageable in the future
previously this was a complicated rust wrapper because I didn't understand rust.
now I understand rust, so I'll make it a different kind of complicated wrapper
This fixes various race conditions that affect test execution when using the servodriver product. It doesn't yet do enough to make servodriver a viable alternative to the normal servo test executor.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6161)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
* Add parser support for 3d transforms.
* Change ComputedMatrix to a representation that suits interpolation.
* Switch stacking contexts to use 4x4 matrices.
The transforms themselves are still converted to 2d and handled by azure for now, but this is a small standalone part that can be landed now to make it easier to review.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6214)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The existing code for setting up the environment assumes that
the directory layout containing rust and cargo conforms to the
one used by rust-installer's tarballs. This makes overriding
the system root awkward for simple cases where I want to test
my own build directly from the rust build directory. This
patch just adds a second path to PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH
to accomodate both disk layouts.
Conflicts:
python/servo/command_base.py
This reverts commit 945adabd48.
The CSS Working Group resolved to drop this value from the spec:
http://log.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2015-05-20/#e555680
The group was unable to come up with even a theoretical use case.
Gecko only implemented this value for completeness.
Other browsers vendors have clearly expressed they have no interest
in implementing this.
