This adds basic support for `text-transform` in a way that is more
complete than legacy layout. There are still many missing elements of
proper `text-transform` support such as:
1. Support for `full-width` and `full-size-kana`
2. Support for grapheme based uppercasing, lowercasing, and
capitalization. These are all done per-code point right now.
3. Support for the language-specific `SpecialCasing.txt` cases for case
mapping such as the ones for Irish and Turkish.
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
This moves white space collapse to right before breaking and shaping
happens, which is more similar to what happens in legacy layout. This is
the first step toward making this procedure more efficient (avoiding
string copies) and also implementing support for `text-transform`.
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
* layout: Add *very* basic support for table layout
This is the first step to proper table layout. It implements a naive
layout algorithm, notably only taking into account the preferred widths
of the first table row. Still, it causes some float tests to start
passing, so turn on the `layout.tables.enabled` preference for those
directories.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Address review comments
* Fix a crash with rowspan=0
* Turn on pref and update results for `/css/css-tables` and `/css/CSS2/tables`
---------
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This is the first part of constructing the box tree for table layout. No
layout is actually done and the construction of tables is now hidden
behind a flag (in order to not regress WPT). Notably, this does not
handle anonymous table part construction, when the DOM does not reflect
a fully-formed table. That's part two.
Progress toward #27459.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Manish Goregaokar <manishsmail@gmail.com>
When a box has overflow, any floats placed in that box will lower the
float ceiling into the overflow. If no float is placed in the box
though, the ceiling should be the block position where the overflow
starts. We already know where this is, because we might be passing a
negative value for the new block position after processing a box
(content_size - actual_size would be negative). This negative value
never raises the ceiling though since a maximum is used.
In the case that there is overflow, this change allows raising the
ceiling, but never passed the lowest float. This necessitates keeping
two values for the ceiling: one for floats and one for non-floats.
Fixes#30304.
This makes the names of flow relative geometry consistent with what is
used in the style crate and removes them from a module. With this change
it's more obvious what makes these types different from the ones in
`euclid`.
Since #29950, unit tests were only running with the legacy layout, and
there was no way to run them for layout 2020.
This patch makes './mach test-unit' run unit tests for both.
Also doing some changes so that the layout 2020 floats.rs tests compile.
Fix two issues around floating a root element:
1. In the StackingContext code handle the case where a root element is a
Float fragment and not a Box fragment. This fixes a debug assertion
failure in the css/CSS2/float/float-root.html test.
2. When initializing the SequentialLayoutState, use the containing block
width as the maximum inline float placement position instead of
infinity. This fixes the rendering of css/CSS2/float/float-root.html.
Note that css/CSS2/float/float-root.html was passing before, because
both the test and reference were subject to the same bug. This fixes a
couple other tests as well.
Instead of hoisting floated fragments to be siblings of the fragment
created by their containing block formatting context, keep them in
"normal" fragment tree position and adjust their positioning to be
relative to the containing block. This means that float fragments follow
the existing invariants of the fragment tree and properly handle hit
testing, painting order, and relative positioning.
The tradeoff here is more complexity tracking the containing block
offsets from the block formatting context (including handling collapsed
margins), but less complexity dealing with hoisting / shared ownership
in addition to the correctness benefits.
Some tests are failing now because this change revealed some additional
shortcomings with clearing block formatting context content size past
the end of their contained floats. This will be fixed in a followup
change.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This commit puts floats behind the `layout.floats.enabled` pref, because of the
following issues and unimplemented features:
* Inline formatting contexts don't take floats into account, so text doesn't
flow around the floats yet.
* Non-floated block formatting contexts don't take floats into account, so BFCs
can overlap floats.
* Block formatting contexts that contain floats don't expand vertically to
contain all the floats. That is, floats can stick out the bottom of BFCs,
contra spec.
context, to place floats in layout 2020.
The containing block for a float is not necessarily the same as the block
formatting context the float is in per CSS 2.1 [1]:
"For other elements, if the element’s position is relative or static, the
containing block is formed by the content edge of the nearest block container
ancestor box."
This shows up in the simplest case:
<html>
<body>
<div style="float: left">Hello</div>
</body>
</html>
In this case, the `<html>` element is the block formatting context with inline
size equal to the width of the window, but the `<body>` element with nonzero
inline margins is the containing block for the float. The float placement must
respect the content box of the `<body>` element (i.e. floats must not overlap
the `<body>` element's margins), not that of the `<html>` element.
Because a single block formatting context may contain floats with different
containing blocks, the left and right "walls" of that containing block become
properties of individual floats at the time of placement, not properties of the
float context itself.
Additionally, this commit generalizes the float placement logic a bit to allow
the placement of arbitrary objects, not just floats. This is intended to
support inline layout and block formatting context placement.
This commit updates the `FloatContext` and associated tests only and doesn't
actually wire the context up to the rest of layout, so floats in pages still
aren't actually laid out.
[1]: https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/#containing-block-details
2020, not yet wired to the rest of layout.
This commit implements an object that handles the 10 rules in CSS 2.1:
https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#float-position
The implementation strategy is that of a persistent balanced binary search tree
of float bands. Binary search trees are commonly used for implementing float
positioning; e.g. by WebKit. Persistence enables each object that interacts
with floats to efficiently contain a snapshot of the float list at the time
that object was laid out. That way, incremental layout can invalidate and start
reflow at any point in a containing block.
This commit features extensive use of
[QuickCheck](https://github.com/BurntSushi/quickcheck) to ensure that the rules
of the CSS specification are followed.
Because this is not yet connected to layout, floats will not actually be laid
out in Web pages yet.
Note that unit tests as set up in Servo currently require types that they
access to be public. Therefore, some internal layout 2020 types that were
previously private have been made public. This is somewhat unfortunate.
Part of #25167.
