Build Fragments without the RECONSTRUCT_FLOW bit
The RECONSTRUCT_FLOW restyle damage bit shouldn't apply to newly
constructed flow tree elements. It is explicitly removed for Flows, but
not for Fragments. This causes RECONSTRUCT_FLOW to bubble up to Flows
that contain any Fragments at all. Instead explicitly remove the
RECONSTRUCT_FLOW bit when creating a new Fragment.
There isn't a good way to test this currently, but all tests should
continue to pass.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8702)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The RECONSTRUCT_FLOW restyle damage bit shouldn't apply to newly
constructed flow tree elements. It is explicitly removed for Flows, but
not for Fragments. This causes RECONSTRUCT_FLOW to bubble up to Flows
that contain any Fragments at all. Instead explicitly remove the
RECONSTRUCT_FLOW bit when creating a new Fragment.
There isn't a good way to test this currently, but all tests should
continue to pass.
Refactor http_fetch to reflect the new standard
Partial #4576. The spec is really getting funky now - it's depending more and more on the DOM objects (e.g. prompting the user for authentication using a `Window` object). I think we can just pass in username and password as properties of the `Request` struct though.
I've also added in the async version for http_request.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8516)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Updated string_cache, html5ever, xml5ever and selectors in Cargo.toml files and Cargo.lock.
Removed references to string_cache_plugin.
Import atom! and ns! from string_cache.
Replaced ns!("") by ns!().
Replaced ns!(XML) and co by ns!(xml) and co.
Replaced atom!(foo) by atom!("foo").
Replaced Atom::from_slice by Atom::from.
Replaced atom.as_slice() by &*atom.
Implement Range#deleteContents
Sadly calling ExtractContents and discarding the result doesn't do the right thing.
It may be worth having a CutContents method that takes an `Option<DocumentFragment>` and switch the behavior based on it, to share the code between DeleteContents and ExtractContents, like what Gecko does. Maybe a followup.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6826)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Write animated values into the `ComputedValues` structures when animations complete or are interrupted.
This adds a new pair of reader-writer locks. I measured the performance
of style recalculation on Wikipedia and the overhead of the locks was
not measurable.
Closes#7816.
cc @paulrouget
r? @glennw
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8670)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
animations complete or are interrupted.
This adds a new pair of reader-writer locks. I measured the performance
of style recalculation on Wikipedia and the overhead of the locks was
not measurable.
Closes#7816.
Improve readability of flow tree dump
Use the PrintTree utility to improve the readability of flow tree
dumps. Blocks and fragments are now split over two dump levels, because
otherwise they are impenetrable. Also start printing the restyle damage of
fragments.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8632)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use the PrintTree utility to improve the readability of flow tree
dumps. Blocks and fragments are now split over two dump levels, because
otherwise they are impenetrable. Also start printing the restyle damage of
fragments.
