Make the global options more resilient to unit tests running in paral…
…lel.
This should allow #6490 to land, since it's hitting problems with unit tests that create a resource task and therefore race on calling opts::get().
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6681)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Register/unregister memory reporters in a better place.
By doing this on either side of the call to the relevant tasks' start()
method, we don't need to store the mem::ProfilerChan or the reporter
name in the task itself.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6608)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
By doing this on either side of the call to the relevant tasks' start()
method, we don't need to store the mem::ProfilerChan or the reporter
name in the task itself.
Make doc comments not truncated again.
`rustdoc --passes "collapse-docs unindent-comments"` doesn’t work is intended. It still generate HTML files that look alright at a glance, but all doc-comments are truncated to their first line for some reason I don’t understand.
See http://doc.servo.org/script/dom/index.html for example. The module documentation there is currently just “The implementation of the DOM.”, but clicking the [src] link shows a much larger doc-comment.
The correct invocation is to use `--passes` multiple times.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15347#issuecomment-122785714
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6668)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
`rustdoc --passes "collapse-docs unindent-comments"` doesn’t work is intended.
It still generate HTML files that look alright at a glance,
but all doc-comments are truncated to their first line
for some reason I don’t understand.
See http://doc.servo.org/script/dom/index.html for example.
The module documentation there is currently just
“The implementation of the DOM.”, but clicking the [src] link
shows a much larger doc-comment.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15347#issuecomment-122785714
The correct invokation is to use `--passes` multiple times.
Implement Range#insertNode
Gecko doesn't really follow the spec but it seems to throw a HierarchyRequest error when parent is null.
Any ideas who I should talk to about fixing the spec to account for the null checks?
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6568)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
It is a field that is used a function argument. Given that the control flow
is not quite the same, and we can't add an argument to Send, I opted for a
separate function.
