The API for text control selection is the same for both <input> and
<textarea>:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/form-control-infrastructure.html#textFieldSelection
Before this change, they had similar but not identical implementations
with duplicate code. Now there is a common TextControl trait which
contains the implementation used by both. As a result, some previously
failing tests now pass.
style: Move font-variant-numeric outside of mako
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? @emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19276
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19277)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Replace "internal" properties with "enabled_in"
This allows enabling properties in ua sheets and chrome differently.
The setup is:
* enabled_in needs to be one of the four values:
["", "ua", "chrome", "content"]
* "chrome" implies "ua", and implies that they're explicitly enabled.
* "" implies the property will never be parsed.
* "content" implies the property is accessible unconditionally, modulo a pref.
Experimental still keeps trumping over those when the pref is enabled.
This PR replaces uses of internal="" by enabled_in="ua" or enabled_in="".
This may seem that it changes behavior, but since the properties where I added
enabled_in="" already unconditionally error from parse it's not.
Next step is annotating chrome-only properties.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19267)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This allows enabling properties in ua sheets and chrome differently.
The setup is:
* enabled_in needs to be one of the four values:
["", "ua", "chrome", "content"]
* "chrome" implies "ua", and implies that they're explicitly enabled.
* "" implies the property will never be parsed.
* "content" implies the property is accessible unconditionally, modulo a pref.
Experimental still keeps trumping over those when the pref is enabled.
This PR replaces uses of internal="" by enabled_in="ua" or enabled_in="".
This may seem that it changes behavior, but since the properties where I added
enabled_in="" already unconditionally error from parse it's not.
Next step is annotating chrome-only properties.
Move custom elements stuff to their own dom::bindings submodule
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
r? jdm
Moved the following functions from components/script/dom/bindings/interface.rs to a new file components/script/dom/bindings/htmlconstructor.rs:
- html_constructor()
- get_constructor_object_from_local_name()
- pop_current_element_queue()
- push_new_element_queue()
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19179.
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19254)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Move font-variant-ligatures outside of mako
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? @emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19246
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19253)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Add infra to differentiate chrome and UA sheets.
This keeps the behavior of stuff being accessible from chrome stylesheets being
the same of content sheets except on the UA origin. That will be changed in a
followup.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19235)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Initial steps of Mutation testing
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
- Added one strategy of mutation which is replacing occurrences && to ||.
- Added test mapping framework for running mutation tests corresponding to a mutant.
- Added one test_mapping.json to map source file in a folder to WPT test.
- Added README mentioning about Mutation testing.
- Added CI script to invoke mutation test.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes #18529 (github issue number if applicable).
- [x] These changes do not require tests because it is a python script to run mutation test and does not change any behavior.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18984)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
fix annotation URL
The annotation URL for `scroll_node` is wrong. (The origin URL is where it is called, not its implement.)
The implement is in https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#element-scrolling-members
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19249)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Move font-variant-east-asian outside of mako
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19216
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19220)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Sprinkle some inline in trivial methods.
These methods are instantiated by the Gecko library, and used during
querySelector, which means that they end up being super-hot in micro-benchmarks.
MozReview-Commit-ID: K1XJb0QyX5a
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19226)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
