Session history fixup
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
When a browsing context was removed, its entries were not removed from the joint session history.
The embedder should be notified that the history changed after a navigation matures.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach build-geckolib` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20629)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This new implementation of the session history keeps track of
a single tree of browsing contexts and pipelines which represents
the active entry of the session history and it keeps track of
diffs between adjacent entries. This allows use to traverse across
the joint session history by applying diffs to the active tree.
Implement a URL-generic type for ListStyleImage
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This should fix the following two "expected to fail" tests described in https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/18015:
- getComputedStyle(elem) for url() listStyleImage uses the resolved URL
and elem.style uses the original URL
- getComputedStyle(elem) for url() listStyle uses the resolved URL
and elem.style uses the original URL
I updated the test failure expectations by removing the corresponding `.ini` file.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#18015 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20482)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This should fix the following two "expected to fail" tests:
- getComputedStyle(elem) for url() listStyleImage uses the resolved URL
and elem.style uses the original URL
- getComputedStyle(elem) for url() listStyle uses the resolved URL
and elem.style uses the original URL
NCSU Canvas Rendering Project Initial Steps
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Implements the initial steps from:
https://github.com/servo/servo/wiki/Canvas-rendering-project
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20447)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Properly rethrow any exceptions from parsing JSON in Body mixin's `Json()`
This fixes#13464 by rethrowing exceptions from parsing JSON.
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
- [X] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20450)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Issue #15723: Skip git ignored files in update-manifest.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This patch makes "./mach update-manifest" aware of .gitignore.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#15725 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because I don't know how to test it, I have tried mocking opening file and checking whether it exists but it's difficult to handle both in py2.7 and py3 and I think it would say too much about `PathFilter` internals. I have also tried mocking `PathFilter` but then I would be duplicating logic in tests.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19550)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
TextDecoder: streaming decode, ignoreBOM
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Implement streaming decode and ignoreBOM flag for TextDecoder.
https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-textdecoder-decodehttps://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-textdecoder-ignorebom
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#13234 (github issue number if applicable).
- [x] These changes fix#5600 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because the wpt tests are used for testing:
* /encoding/textdecoder-fatal-streaming.html
* /encoding/textdecoder-streaming.html
* /encoding/textdecoder-ignorebom.html
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20431)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
TextDecoder's Decode now receives a BufferSource as input
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
r? jdm
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#20344 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20413)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
feat(fetch): accept arraybuffer in consume_body
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Related to https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/20346.
I realized I am not sufficiently knowledgeable about codebases and have high confidence this PR is not ready to be accepted. Raising it as PR early to possibly ask some suggestions around codebases.
If this PR seems unrecoverable by code review, please feel freely close and unassign me from issue 🙏
This PR tries to implement #20346, updating `Body` idl and implements corresponding implementation in `body.rs` for `fetch`. Criteria for changes may includes
- does `run_array_buffer_data_algorithm` implementation is legit for allocating arraybuffer? (probably not)
- does `run_array_buffer_data_algorithm` implementation is acceptable for handling error, by naively returning `Error::JSFailed`?
- there are some number of wpt test started to PASS with this PR. Is this legit side effect, or something incorrect by current implementation?
- etcs, vice versa
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#20346 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
- wpt test has changed in PR, need to be reviewed.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20406)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add constructors for typed arrays in DOMMatrix and DOMMatrixReadOnly
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
- DOMMatrix now have the functions: FromFloat32Array, FromFloat64Array.
- DOMMatrixReadOnly now have the functions: FromFloat32Array, FromFloat64Array, ToFloat32Array, ToFloat64Array.
r? @jdm
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#20349 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20405)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->