`./mach test tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/html/browsers/history/the-location-interface/security_location_0.sub.htm` is still failing with the same message as reported in #3219.
CGDataProviderCreateWithData just wraps the underlying buffer. The
underlying buffer needs to be kept around until the data provider is
freed. Adding the buffer to the FontTemplateData struct ensures it
sticks around.
`./mach test-wpt` will fail in non-obvious ways unless all wpt submodules have recursively been checked out first. This ensure they have been when running the command in a checkout of Servo that hasn't been bootstrapped yet.
CGDataProviderCreateWithData just wraps the underlying buffer. The
underlying buffer needs to be kept around until the data provider is
freed. Adding the buffer to the FontTemplateData struct ensures it
sticks around.
SSL is broken-ish (eg tw.yahoo.com, html.spec.whatwg.org don't work since we don't verify SAN properly), this flag can let devs bypass the protection for testing purposes.
Looking for some review, due to a couple of issues:
* The vmin/vmax tests fail due to exit status being 1 instead of 0. However, when I manually check them via `./mach run tests/ref/viewport_percentage_vmax_vmin{,a,b,c}.html`, the pages render correctly
* Resizing is incredibly flaky. I've checked (via logging), and the actual calculation of the computed length is correct for a given viewport size. However, the box dimensions end up all over the place. I've attached a screenshot to demonstrate (the box is supposed to cover the top-left quarter of the window).
Fixes#5165.
When a viewport is resized, the computed values for a style containing viewport percentage length units become stale. However, there's no way for those styles to be invalidated after a resize. As a solution, this commit invalidates the computed values cache after a resize has occurred, which is probably over-kill.
A better solution would probably be to track under what conditions computed values remain valid, and invalidate them as indicated.
Fixes#5158
Part of this involved switching to OsStrings for process arguments. Those now interface awkwardly with some remaining use old_io, but that will only be needed until rustc is newer.
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
r? @SimonSapin
`cellspacing` attribute per HTML5 § 14.3.9.
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
This commit also fixes two nasty issues in table layout:
* In fixed layout, extra space would not be divided among columns that
had auto width but had nonzero minimum width.
* In automatic layout, extra space would be distributed to constrained
columns as well even if unconstrained columns with percentage equal to
zero were present.
This is GIF specific. It's also done when the image is PNG but PNG is
handled separately with the PNG crate, whereas GIFs are handled by the
stb-image crate and the distinction between alpha and non-alpha-supporting
images was missing.
Fix for issue #2108. That issue mentions an `unwrap_object` which doesn't seem to exist so I renamed `unwrap` to `native_from_reflector` and `unwrap_jsmanaged` to `native_from_reflector_jsmanaged`. The latter is a bit unweildy - maybe a shorter name might be better?
As noted by @bholley. "unwrap" is confusing because we are
both stripping off wrappers *and* getting a native from a
reflector. Changing the "unwrap" usage to "native_from_reflector"
for clarity.
This renames 'unwrap' to 'native_from_reflector' and
'unwrap_jsmanaged' to 'native_from_reflector_jsmanaged'.
This is GIF specific. It's also done when the image is PNG but PNG is
handled separately with the PNG crate, whereas GIFs are handled by the
stb-image crate and the distinction between alpha and non-alpha-supporting
images was missing.
This will be re-introduced in a follow up PR with a different usage, but I'm trying to create small, independent PRs that are easier to review than one large change.
